🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.